Predictive Value of Procalcitonin and Lymphocyte Count for Secondary Infection Risk in Patients Hospitalized with Influenza Pneumonia
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
RESEARCH ARTICLE
VOLUME: 14 ISSUE: 1
P: 6 - 6
January 2025

Predictive Value of Procalcitonin and Lymphocyte Count for Secondary Infection Risk in Patients Hospitalized with Influenza Pneumonia

Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob 2025;14(1):6-6
1. Erzurum City Hospital, Clinic of Intensive Care, Erzurum, Türkiye
2. Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Department of Intensive Care, İstanbul, Türkiye
3. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health, Şırnak Provincial Health Directorate, Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, Şırnak, Türkiye
4. Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Department of Intensive Care-Pulmonary Disease, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 09.06.2024
Accepted Date: 28.01.2025
Online Date: 18.03.2025
Publish Date: 18.03.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Introduction

The primary complications of influenza are secondary infections, particularly pneumonia, which contribute to increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, no reliable methods exist to differentiate secondary infections occurring alongside influenza. This study aimed to evaluate the role of procalcitonin (PCT) and lymphocyte count in predicting mortality and diagnosing secondary infections in patients hospitalized with influenza pneumonia.

Materials and Methods

Patients with confirmed influenza and radiological evidence of lung infiltration on chest X-ray or computed tomography were included. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were classified into two groups: those with influenza alone and those with influenza and a secondary infection. The highest PCT level and the lowest lymphocyte count recorded during hospitalization were analyzed for their association with secondary infection risk and mortality.

Results

Among 66 patients, 30 (45%) were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU), while 36 (55%) received care in the general ward. Secondary infections were identified in 29 patients (43.9%). Although ICU admission rates did not differ between groups, mortality was 38.4% in patients with secondary infections and 3% in those with influenza alone. During the 5-day influenza treatment period, C-reactive protein and PCT levels showed no significant differences between groups. The highest median PCT levels in discharged and deceased patients were 1.63 and 9.8 μg/L, respectively (p=0.005). The mean lowest lymphocyte count in discharged and deceased patients were 300 cells/mL and 100 cells/mL, respectively (p=0.008). Among patients with a lowest lymphocyte count below 200 cells/mL, the secondary infection rate was 73% compared to 35.3% (p=0.031) in those with a count above 200 cells/mL. Additionally, mortality was 46% vs. 9.8% (p=0.001), and hospital stay was longer at 20 (13-40) days vs. 15 (9-19) days (p=0.047), respectively.

Conclusion

Patients hospitalized with influenza frequently develop secondary infections, which are linked to higher mortality. A lymphocyte count below 200 cells/mL is associated with an risk of secondary infection, prolonged hospitalization, and higher mortality. Although elevated PCT levels were also linked to an increased risk of secondary infections and mortality, this association was not statistically significant.

Keywords:
Influenza, secondary infection, lymphopenia, procalcitonin, pneumonia, mortality

Introduction

Influenza viruses, which primarily circulate during winter, have historically caused pandemics approximately every decade. Secondary infections, particularly pneumonia[1, 2], are the most common complications of influenza and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality[3, 4]. Since influenza strains responsible for pandemics generally cause self-limiting illnesses, the accurate diagnosis and treatment of concurrent bacterial infections are essential to reducing mortality and morbidity. During the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak, the incidence of secondary infections among intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted influenza patients was reported to be 18-34%, significantly contributing to increased mortality[5, 6].

Currently, no reliable method exists to differentiate viral from bacterial lower respiratory tract infections in patients with influenza. The 2019 American Thoracic Society-Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines recommend empirical antibiotic therapy for patients with influenza pneumonia[7]. However, ruling out secondary infections could help reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, lower healthcare costs, minimize adverse effects, and prevent the emergence of multidrug-resistant infections.

In infection management, procalcitonin (PCT) is not recommended for initiating antibiotic therapy but is advised for guiding antibiotic discontinuation[8]. However, data on the role of PCT in predicting secondary infections in H1N1 patients are limited, and findings remain inconsistent[9-12].

Lymphopenia frequently occurs in viral infections, and leukocytosis with relative lymphopenia has been widely used for diagnosing influenza A H1N1 in emergency settings[13-16]. Prolonged lymphopenia has been linked to respiratory failure and increased mortality in patients with influenza pneumonia[17]. However, its role in diagnosing secondary infections in influenza patients remains uncertain.

This study aimed to assess the impact of PCT and lymphocyte levels on diagnosing secondary infections and predicting mortality in patients hospitalized with influenza pneumonia.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Marmara University Ethics Committee (approval number: 09.2020.969, dated: 02.10.2020). Due to the retrospective, observational, cross-sectional design of the study, written informed consent was not obtained from the patients. The study included patients who were monitored in the ICU or inpatient ward following a diagnosis of influenza pneumonia between October 2018 and January 2020. Influenza pneumonia was diagnosed based on a positive influenza quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test from a nasal swab, along with evidence of lung infiltration on chest X-ray or computed tomography. Patients younger than 18 years were excluded.

Patient medical records were reviewed retrospectively using hospital information management systems and patient files. Data collected included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, coexisting viral infections, empirical antibiotic and antiviral treatment (dose and duration), daily C-reactive protein (CRP), PCT, leukocyte (white blood cell) count for the first 5 days, highest PCT and lowest lymphocyte levels recorded during hospitalization, length of stay in the inpatient ward, ICU severity scores [Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment], use of mechanical ventilation (invasive and non-invasive), vasopressor therapy, ICU and total hospitalization duration, and in-hospital mortality.

A total lymphocyte counts of <1000 cells/mL (<1x109/L) in adults is defined as lymphopenia[18]. In our laboratory, the reference range for PCT is 0-0.5 μg/L, while the normal range for CRP is 0-5 mg/L.

Patients were categorized into two groups: those with influenza infection only and those with influenza accompanied by a secondary infection. Bacteremia was diagnosed in patients with infection symptoms based on bacterial growth in aerobic and anaerobic cultures from two sets of blood samples collected from separate venous sites. Cases of contamination and colonization were excluded by assessing clinical findings consistent with bacteremia and elevated inflammatory markers. However, the infection source was not recorded for patients diagnosed with bacteremia. Patients with secondary infections were further classified into two groups: those with concurrent infection (developing a secondary infection within 72 hours of influenza diagnosis) and those who developed secondary infection after completing influenza treatment (occurring between 5 days and 1 month of continued hospitalization). No patients developed secondary infection between the third and fifth days of treatment. All groups were compared based on recorded data, including secondary infectious agents and antibiotic use. The highest PCT level and lowest lymphocyte count during hospitalization were analyzed for their association with secondary infection risk and mortality. Additionally, the relationship between secondary infection development and mortality was examined based on the presence and duration of lymphopenia. Patients were classified into three groups: those without lymphopenia, those with lymphopenia lasting ≤5 days, and those with lymphopenia lasting >5 days.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) 2007 Statistical Software (Utah, USA) and Stata version 15.1, year 2017 (StataCorp 4905, Texas, USA). The independent t-test was used to compare descriptive statistical measures (mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range) and normally distributed binary variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparing binary groups of non-normally distributed variables, while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons involving three groups of non-normally distributed variables. Qualitative data were analyzed using the chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General Characteristics of Patients

A total of 66 patients diagnosed with influenza pneumonia and hospitalized between October 2018 and January 2020 were included in the study. Of these, 54 patients presented to the emergency department due to influenza, while 12 were diagnosed during hospitalization for other conditions. Among the patients, 30 (45%) received treatment in the ICU, and 36 (55%) were treated in the inpatient clinic.

The mean age of the patients was 69 years (ranging from 51 to 76 years). Hypertension (53.3%) and diabetes mellitus (31.8%) were the most common comorbidities. Additionally, 50% of the patients had chronic respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, restrictive lung disease, and lung malignancies (Table 1).

It was noted that 90% of patients received antibiotic therapy, with 50% starting antibiotics on the first day of hospitalization.

Relationship Between Influenza and Secondary Infection

A total of 29 patients (43.9%) developed a secondary infection. Among these, bacteremia was identified in 12 patients (41.3%), bacterial pneumonia in 19 patients (65.5%), and urinary tract infection in 15 patients (51.72%).

Across 57 secondary infections in 29 patients, 10 different infectious agents were detected. The most common pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii (7 cases, 12.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5 cases, 8.7%), Escherichia coli (4 cases, 7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2 cases, 3.5%), other Gram-negative bacteria (4 cases, 7%), Staphylococcus aureus (6 cases, 10.5%), Enterococcus species (9 cases, 15.7%), Corynebacterium species (3 cases, 5.2%), Candida albicans (10 cases, 17.5%), and non-albicans Candida species (7 cases, 12.2%).

Secondary infections were observed in 12 out of 36 patients (33%) in the inpatient clinic and in 17 out of 30 patients (56%) in the ICU. Among ICU patients, the APACHE II score was significantly higher in those with secondary infection [median, 20 (17-26)] compared to those without [median, 15 (12-17), p=0.007].

Although ICU admission rates did not differ significantly between groups, mortality was higher in patients with secondary infections (10/29, 34.4%) compared to those without (2/37, 5.4%) (p=0.001). The median hospital stay was longer in patients with secondary infections [22 days (14-40)] than in those without [13 days (7-16)] (p=0.001) (Table 2).

No significant differences were observed in CRP, PCT, or WBC values at admission between patients with and without secondary infections (Table 3).

Association of PCT with Secondary Infection and Clinical Outcomes

During the 5-day course of influenza treatment, CRP and PCT levels showed no significant difference between groups (Figure 1).

Although the highest PCT levels recorded during hospitalization were higher in patients with secondary infections compared to those without (2.77 μg/L vs. 1.71 μg/L), the difference was not statistically significant. In patients with secondary infections, PCT levels stopped declining after day 3.

When patients were grouped based on PCT levels, there were no significant differences in mortality or length of hospitalization (Table 4). However, the mean highest PCT levels were 1.63 μg/L in discharged patients and 9.8 μg/L in deceased patients (p=0.005). The median highest PCT concentrations were significantly higher in ICU patients (6.05 μg/L) compared to those in the inpatient clinic (1.25 μg/L) (p = 0.001).

Relationship Among Lymphopenia, Secondary Infection, and Clinical Outcomes

At the time of influenza diagnosis, 51 patients (77%) had a lymphocyte count of <1000 cells/mL. Among the patients, 6 (0.9%) did not experience lymphopenia during hospitalization, 16 (24%) had lymphopenia lasting ≤5 days, and 44 (66%) had lymphopenia lasting >5 days. No significant differences in mortality rates or secondary infection development were found between these groups.

The mean lowest lymphocyte count in discharged patients was 300 cells/mL, compared to 100 cells/mL in deceased patients (p=0.008). ICU patients had a mean lowest lymphocyte count of 200 cells/mL, while those in the inpatient clinic had a mean of 350 cells/mL (p=0.03).

Patients with the lowest lymphocyte count below 200 cells/mL during hospitalization had a significantly higher rate of secondary infection (73% vs. 35.3%, p=0.031), higher mortality rate (46% vs. 9.8%, p=0.001), and longer hospital stays [20 days (13-40) vs. 15 days (9-19), p=0.047)] compared to those with counts above 200 cells/mL (Table 4).

Discussion

In this study, patients with influenza pneumonia and a lymphocyte count below 200 cells/mL had significantly higher rates of secondary infections, longer hospital stays and increased mortality. Although higher PCT levels tended to correlate with an increased frequency of secondary infections and mortality, the differences were not statistically significant.

The risk of secondary infection is higher in influenza pneumonia compared to other viral pneumonias, likely due to influenza A’s ability to target alveolar macrophages via the PB1-F2 protein[19, 20]. The pooled prevalence of influenza bacterial co-infection was 20.3% (95% confidence interval =16.0-25.4) in a meta-analysis including 63 articles; however, in our study, the rate was 43.9%[21].

The link between secondary infections and increased mortality remains controversial[5, 6, 10, 22, 23]. In our study, patients with secondary infections had significantly longer hospital stays and higher mortality rates (p<0.0001).

Lymphopenia is commonly seen in viral infections and is frequently used to help diagnose influenza A H1N1 in emergency settings[13-15]. Hage et al.[16] found that relative lymphopenia occurred in all patients with influenza A H1N1, with the lowest lymphocyte count typically reached by day 3.5.

The role of lymphopenia in the development of secondary infections in influenza remains unclear, although it has been associated with poor prognosis. In hospitalized influenza A H1N1 patients, a lymphocyte count <800 cells/mL at admission was identified as an independent risk factor for respiratory failure[24]. Cui et al.[25] found that persistent lymphopenia after 5 days was a risk factor for mortality, with ICU patients having a lymphocyte count of 580 cells/mL and non-ICU patients having 1065 cells/mL. In our study, ICU patients had a lymphocyte count of 200 cells/mL, while those in the inpatient clinic had 350 cells/mL. Similarly, Cui et al.[25] reported lymphocyte count of 580 cells/mL in deceased patients and 790 cells/mL in survivors. In our study, the lowest lymphocyte count in discharged and deceased patients were 300 cells/mL and 100 cells/mL, respectively. Although lymphopenia is not a definitive risk factor for mortality, most surviving patients (93.1%) showed improvement in lymphocyte count within approximately 5 days. Lymphopenia lasting longer than 5 days was observed in 70% of deceased patients and 6.8% of survivors[25]. In our study, no statistically significant differences in secondary infection or mortality were found between patients with no lymphopenia, lymphopenia lasting <5 days, or lymphopenia lasting >5 days.

In the study by Lalueza et al.[17], 59% of patients had lymphopenia (<1000 cells/mL) at hospitalization, with the rate increasing to 71.7% during the hospital stay. Lymphopenia (<500 cell/mL) at admission was linked to respiratory failure, while the lowest lymphocyte value (<300 cell/mL) was associated with both respiratory failure and poor prognosis[17]. In our study, no statistically significant correlation was found between secondary infection development and lymphocyte level at the time of diagnosis.

Consistent previous studies, we observed that increased mortality was associated with longer hospitalization in patients with a lymphocyte count <200 cells/mL during hospitalization. Additionally, the secondary infection rate was significantly higher in the group with a lymphocyte count <200 cells/mL.

In a meta-analysis of six studies examining the relationship between PCT and secondary infection, the area under the curve (AUC) value for PCT was 0.68 for detecting secondary infection, with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 64%. The AUC value was 0.73 in the subgroup of ICU patients[26]. In our study, the PCT value at admission was not significantly predictive of secondary infection. The AUC value for mortality in our study was 0.61.

Another study emphasized that the course of PCT, rather than a single measurement, is important. It reported that high baseline PCT levels decreased over time in both ICU patients with isolated influenza and those with secondary infection, with significantly lower PCT levels at 24, 48, and 120 hours in the isolated H1N1 group compared to the secondary infection group[27]. In our study, PCT values were high at baseline and decreased over time in both groups. When comparing PCT values at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours, the rate of decline in PCT levels after 72 hours in the group with secondary infection tended to decrease, but no statistical significance was found. Additionally, the frequency of secondary infections was 31.8% in those with the highest PCT values below 0.5 and 53% in those with values over 10. Thus, a tendency for increased secondary infection frequency was observed with higher PCT values (p>0.05). Mortality was 4.5% in those with the highest PCT values below 0.5, 10% in those with values between 0.5 and 2, 26.5% in those with values between 2 and 10, and 35.5% in those with values above 10. As PCT values increased, mortality also tended to increase (p=0.057). The lack of statistical insignificance may be due to the small sample size.

Study Limitations

The primary limitation of our study is its retrospective, single-center design. Only patients with microbiologically confirmed secondary infections were included, while those with clinically suspected secondary infection were excluded. However, the lack of culture growth results could influence the findings. Additionally, the empirical antibiotic therapy administered to most patients might have impacted the results.

This, however, remains debatable, as some studies suggest that excluding patients receiving empirical antibiotic therapy does not alter the results[28]. While lymphopenia was considered, another limitation is that other potential causes of lymphopenia were not explored.

Conclusion

Patients hospitalized with influenza had high rates of secondary infections, which were linked to increased mortality. A lymphocyte count of <200 cells/mL was found to be an indicator of the risk for secondary infections, prolonged hospitalization, and higher mortality. Although higher PCT levels were associated with a tendency for increased secondary infections and mortality, this relationship was not statistically significant.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Marmara University Ethics Committee (approval number: 09.2020.969, dated: 02.10.2020).
Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: S.K., Concept: S.K., Design: S.S.İ., Data Collection or Processing: E.T., Analysis or Interpretation: C.I., Literature Search: S.S.İ., Writing: S.S.İ.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA, Barnes M, Ridda I, Seale H, Toms R, Heywood A. The role of pneumonia and secondary bacterial infection in fatal and serious outcomes of pandemic influenza a(H1N1)pdm09. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:637.
2
Bartley PS, Deshpande A, Yu PC, Klompas M, Haessler SD, Imrey PB, Zilberberg MD, Rothberg MB. Bacterial coinfection in influenza pneumonia: rates, pathogens, and outcomes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43:212-7.
3
Choi WJ, Kim WY, Kim SH, Oh BJ, Kim W, Lim KS, Hong SB, Lim CM, Koh Y. Clinical characteristics of pneumonia in hospitalized patients with novel influenza A (H1N1) in Korea. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010;42:311-4.
4
Arranz-Herrero J, Presa J, Rius-Rocabert S, Utrero-Rico A, Arranz-Arija JÁ, Lalueza A, Escribese MM, Ochando J, Soriano V, Nistal-Villan E. Determinants of poor clinical outcome in patients with influenza pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;131:173-9.
5
Rice TW, Rubinson L, Uyeki TM, Vaughn FL, John BB, Miller RR 3rd, Higgs E, Randolph AG, Smoot BE, Thompson BT; NHLBI ARDS Network. Critical illness from 2009 pandemic influenza A virus and bacterial coinfection in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1487-98.
6
ANZIC Influenza Investigators; Webb SA, Pettilä V, Seppelt I, Bellomo R, Bailey M, Cooper DJ, Cretikos M, Davies AR, Finfer S, Harrigan PW, Hart GK, Howe B, Iredell JR, McArthur C, Mitchell I, Morrison S, Nichol AD, Paterson DL, Peake S, Richards B, Stephens D, Turner A, Yung M. Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1925-34.
7
Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, Anzueto A, Brozek J, Crothers K, Cooley LA, Dean NC, Fine MJ, Flanders SA, Griffin MR, Metersky ML, Musher DM, Restrepo MI, Whitney CG. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:45-67.
8
Hamade B, Huang DT. Procalcitonin: Where are we now? Crit Care Clin. 2020;36:23-40.
9
Christensen I, Berild D, Bjørnholt JV, Jelsness-Jørgensen LP, Debes SM, Haug JB. The role of procalcitonin as an antimicrobial stewardship tool in patients hospitalized with seasonal influenza. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12:573.
10
Cuquemelle E, Soulis F, Villers D, Roche-Campo F, Ara Somohano C, Fartoukh M, Kouatchet A, Mourvillier B, Dellamonica J, Picard W, Schmidt M, Boulain T, Brun-Buisson C; A/H1N1 REVA-SRLF Study Group. Can procalcitonin help identify associated bacterial infection in patients with severe influenza pneumonia? A multicentre study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:796-800.
11
Carbonell R, Moreno G, Martín-Loeches I, Gomez-Bertomeu F, Sarvisé C, Gómez J, Bodí M, Díaz E, Papiol E, Trefler S, Nieto M, Estella A, Jiménez Herrera M, Vidal Cortés P, Guardiola JJ, Solé-Violán J, Rodríguez A. Prognostic value of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in 1608 critically ill patients with severe influenza pneumonia. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10:350.
12
Paiva MB, Botoni FA, Teixeira AL Jr, Miranda AS, Oliveira CR, Abrahão Jde O, Faria GM, Nobre V. The behavior and diagnostic utility of procalcitonin and five other inflammatory molecules in critically ill patients with respiratory distress and suspected 2009 influenza a H1N1 infection. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67:327-34.
13
Sherban A, Hussen R, Gafter-Gvili A, Atamna A, Bishara J, Raanani P, Ben Tikva Kagan K, Avni T. The Impact of thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia on mortality in patients infected with influenza virus: a retrospective cohort study. Acta Haematol. 2023;146:482-90.
14
Zhang NN, Zhang Y, Xia JG, Li M, Huang X, Zhang RY, Zhan QY. Severe lymphopenia and related T-cell ımmunity in an avian ınfluenza A (H7N9)-ınfected patient. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018;131:2765-6.
15
Coşkun O, Avci IY, Sener K, Yaman H, Ogur R, Bodur H, Eyigün CP. Relative lymphopenia and monocytosis may be considered as a surrogate marker of pandemic influenza a (H1N1). J Clin Virol. 2010;47:388-9.
16
Hage JE, Petelin A, Cunha BA. Before influenza tests results are available, can droplet precautions be instituted if influenza is suggested by leukopenia, relative lymphopenia, or thrombocytopenia? Am J Infect Control. 2011;39:619-21.
17
Lalueza A, Folgueira D, Díaz-Pedroche C, Hernández-Jiménez P, Ayuso B, Castillo C, Laureiro J, Trujillo H, Torres M, Lumbreras C. Severe lymphopenia in hospitalized patients with influenza virus infection as a marker of a poor outcome. Infect Dis (Lond). 2019;51:543-6.
18
Mansour AG, Caligiuri MA. Lymphocytosis and lymphocytopenia. In: Kaushansky K, Prchal JT, Burns LJ, Lichtman MA, Levi M, Linch DC. eds. Williams Hematology, 10e. McGraw-Hill Education; 2021.
19
McAuley JL, Zhang K, McCullers JA. The effects of influenza A virus PB1-F2 protein on polymerase activity are strain specific and do not impact pathogenesis. J Viro. 2010;84:558-64.
20
Panahipoor Javaherdehi A, Ghanbari S, Mahdavi P, Zafarani A, Razizadeh MH. The role of alveolar macrophages in viral respiratory infections and their therapeutic implications. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;169:115965.
21
Qiao M, Moyes G, Zhu F, Li Y, Wang X. The prevalence of influenza bacterial co-infection and its role in disease severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2023;13:04063.
22
Song JY, Cheong HJ, Heo JY, Noh JY, Yong HS, Kim YK, Kang EY, Choi WS, Jo YM, Kim WJ. Clinical, laboratory and radiologic characteristics of 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 pneumonia: primary influenza pneumonia versus concomitant/secondary bacterial pneumonia. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2011;5:535-43.
23
Ahn S, Kim WY, Kim SH, Hong S, Lim CM, Koh Y, Lim KS, Kim W. Role of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in differentiation of mixed bacterial infection from 2009 H1N1 viral pneumonia. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2011;5:398-403.
24
Chien YS, Su CP, Tsai HT, Huang AS, Lien CE, Hung MN, Chuang JH, Kuo HS, Chang SC. Predictors and outcomes of respiratory failure among hospitalized pneumonia patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in Taiwan. J Infect. 2010;60:168-74.
25
Cui W, Zhao H, Lu X, Wen Y, Zhou Y, Deng B, Wang Y, Wang W, Kang J, Liu P. Factors associated with death in hospitalized pneumonia patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in Shenyang, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:145.
26
Wu MH, Lin CC, Huang SL, Shih HM, Wang CC, Lee CC, Wu JY. Can procalcitonin tests aid in identifying bacterial infections associated with influenza pneumonia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013;7:349-55.
27
Piacentini E, Sánchez B, Arauzo V, Calbo E, Cuchi E, Nava JM. Procalcitonin levels are lower in intensive care unit patients with H1N1 influenza A virus pneumonia than in those with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. A pilot study. J Crit Care. 2011;26:201-5.
28
Pfister R, Kochanek M, Leygeber T, Brun-Buisson C, Cuquemelle E, Machado MB, Piacentini E, Hammond NE, Ingram PR, Michels G. Procalcitonin for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia in critically ill patients during 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: a prospective cohort study, systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18:44.